SCR-SELF-1422026-06-01约 25 分钟阅读

Large models change the AI engineering paradigm

The AI revolution: Large models change the AI engineering paradigm

Largemodelschange

The AI revolution: Large models change the AI engineering paradigm

Shang Can Technology

In July, 2023

abstract

The emergence of artificial intelligence large models has changed the training mode of artificial intelligence, improved the starting point of training, broken through the shortcomings and bottleneck of the original small models, improved the level of intelligence, and brought a new paradigm of artificial intelligence engineering. Enterprises should realize the significance of this revolutionary breakthrough, explore the application of large models to solve enterprise problems, build the enterprise Foundation model, and then build the enterprise intelligent machine matrix, to lay the foundation for the realization of dual-intelligent collaborative business.

The main discovery

Large models are not only language models, but also include multi-modal large models, which can process video, audio, images, and structured data

Large model is a revolutionary breakthrough in the field of artificial intelligence, and its intelligence emergence and generalization ability make artificial intelligence have a high intelligence

Large models can be used not only for content generation, but also for data analysis, modeling and algorithm extraction

The use of large models for data analysis and modeling will completely change the existing data analysis mode and bring a new paradigm of artificial intelligence engineering

The application of the large model can realize the idea of the foundation model, and a variety of small models and expert models can be trained on top of the foundation model

Recommendations

Enterprises should realize the revolutionary significance of the large model and take the foundation model created by the large model as the "base" for the business of dual intelligent collaboration

Explore the value of large models to the business, and find application scenarios in the difficult problems faced by enterprises

When selecting a large model, enterprises should comprehensively consider the applicability, safety and input-output ratio of a large model

To improve the ability to control large models, management ability is an indispensable ability, and technical ability is a plus

foundation model is an idea in the field of artificial intelligence. It is hoped that one model can be the foundation of other models, so that other models can be trained on top of the foundation model. Such a scenario is not fully realized before the large model is produced. It is hard to say that the large model is the only option for the foundation model, but there is no doubt that the large model can be the foundation model. As we have analyzed, a large model refers to the large number of model parameters (feature values of connections between neurons in the neural network). The generally agreed standard is more than 3 billion. At present, many Chinese enterprises say that the number of parameters is more than 1 billion, which can be regarded as a large model. In fact, the model is a relative concept. When the output accuracy of the model is higher than the random value, it indicates that the large model has appeared the emergent ability. The number of parameters at this point is the critical point. When the accuracy reaches the reliability requirements, the large model is available, and the number of parameters is large enough for the required task.

Large models were developed because of the need of AIGC, because machines have the ability to master a lot of knowledge through learning. When the amount of knowledge learned is not large enough, the model does not have enough intelligence to produce meaningful content, so a lot of training materials are needed. With the increase of training materials, the computational speed is faster and faster, and the model becomes more and more large, eventually leading to the generation of large models. Because large models are born to realize AIGC, and because most of the recent large models are mainly used for AIGC tasks, people mistakenly think that large models can only be used for content generation, while ignoring another more important value area, namely the value of the foundation model. The value of this field makes it possible to completely transform the paradigm of artificial intelligence engineering, from "training the model from a kid" to " from a college students ".

Augmented data analytics, a meaningful but less successful attempt at artificial intelligence

Since the concept of big data began to become popular, enterprises have established big data management system and big data analysis system, hoping to find the correlation and law between data through historical data and current data, and use these findings for the analysis of the current situation and the prediction of the future. However, before the Augmented data analysis technology, the design of the data analysis model mainly depends on the model designer's understanding of the business and the manual design. Manual design mode requires designers to have enough understanding of the business, so the designer's business ability and design ability will become the limitation of the data analysis model. On the one hand, the efficiency of manual design is very low, so it is impossible to complete the models required for the business in a relatively short time, and the total amount of models that can be completed manually is very limited. On the other hand, because the designer's understanding of the business is insufficient, the structure of the design cannot fully reflect the law of the business, forming a design bias. These things improved after machine learning was introduced into big data analytics. The automatic discovery of data (Pattern) through machine learning can greatly improve the efficiency of model generation, and break through the cognitive limitations of designers, so that the quantity and quality of analytical models can be improved to a greater extent. If the manual design analysis model is used, a designer can design a model in a year is also very limited. Using Augmented data analysis technology produces thousands of analytical models within minutes. Of course, it will take some time to verify the validity of these models, but the efficiency has been greatly improved.

According to the survey, a considerable number of enterprises have adopted augmenteddata analysis technology. However, the overall application effect is not ideal. There are two main reasons. One is that the technology of augmented data analysis is not well mastered and can not effectively play its effectiveness. Second, the augmented data analysis itself also has defects, because the machine can only find correlation, not causality. At the same time, the focus of machine learning is to discover data analysis models, rather than improving the capabilities of machine learning models themselves. In some application scenarios, such as the application of various intelligent brain, although improving the ability of the intelligent brain is the key, after long-term training, it is found that when the ability of the intelligent brain is improved to a certain extent, it seems to reach the ceiling of the ability, no matter how the training can not be improved. For example, the driverless system cannot overcome the difficulties of complex traffic environment, and the error rate of the language translation system kept at about 20% cannot be further reduced. In the medical field, the recognition of medical images has also hit the ceiling, always not at the level of human experts. In the f

登录后查看全文

本报告免费开放给注册用户,登录即可阅读全文。

相关报告推荐

3581092026-09-17

EPC项目中冷源系统联合调试与负荷模拟匹配度评估方法研究

本报告指出,EPC项目中冷源系统的联合调试效果与实际运行负荷的匹配度,是影响系统能效表现与交付质量的关键控制点。传统调试多聚焦设备单体功能验证与静态工况达标,易忽视建筑负荷动态特性、系统耦合响应及多专业协同逻辑,导致投运后频繁出现冷量冗余、输配失衡或控制滞后等问题。研究提出一种以“负荷驱动”为导向的评估方法:通过构建典型工况下的负荷模拟基准曲线,结合调试过程中的实时运行参数采集与系统响应轨迹比对,量化分析冷源出力、输配调节与末端需求之间的时序一致性与幅值适配性。该方法强调在调试阶段即引入负荷逻辑校验,推动调试从“合格验收”转向“性能就绪”。实践表明,该路径可显著缩短系统调优周期,降低后期运行能

4781422026-09-17

EPC项目中供应商设备交付延迟对整体调试周期影响的传导路径建模研究

本研究揭示:供应商设备交付延迟并非孤立风险,而是通过多重耦合机制显著拉长EPC项目整体调试周期。核心传导路径表现为三重叠加效应——首阶段触发调试资源空转与计划重构,次阶段引发多专业接口复位与交叉作业冲突,末阶段加剧系统级联验证返工。该过程受项目集成复杂度、接口管理成熟度及调试缓冲设计弹性共同调节,呈现非线性放大特征。研究基于动态系统建模识别出关键敏感节点:设备到货与单机调试启动的时序刚性、控制系统联调对末端设备的强依赖性、以及调试数据闭环对首批可用设备的路径锁定效应。结果表明,单纯压缩后续环节工期难以补偿前期交付缺口,而前置化接口协同、模块化预调试及交付-调试联动预警机制可有效削弱传导强度。建

6805802026-09-16

面向智算中心GPU服务器快速上架场景的临时作业区物理安防动态授权模式研究

在智算中心建设中,GPU服务器快速上架对临时作业区物理安防提出了敏捷与安全的双重挑战,亟需构建物理安防动态授权模式。 本研究基于双智协同理念,探讨物理管控与数字认证的深度融合。通过动态授权机制,实现稳态安防底线与敏态作业需求的统一。研究指出,依托智能感知与业务编排脚本,安防系统可根据任务生命周期及人员权限,自动实现权限按需下发与即时回收,打破物理与数字边界。 该模式有效保障了核心算力资产安全,大幅提升交付流转效率,为算力基础设施敏捷运营提供了兼顾安全与效率的物理空间治理新范式。

3689082026-09-16

基于历史安防事件根因分析的物理安防策略规则库迭代优化机制研究

物理安防策略的优化不能仅依赖经验堆砌,而应基于历史安防事件根因分析,构建动态迭代的规则库,实现从被动响应向主动防御的跨越。企业需将历史安防数据进行要素化处理,转化为可计算的安全资产。在此过程中,深度融合双智协同理念,让人工专家经验与智能算法在规则库迭代中优势互补,并通过业务编排脚本将策略自动转化为可执行的防护动作。这不仅是安防技术的升级,更是组织安全治理能力的跃升,需作为一把手工程统筹推进,最终实现物理安防体系的持续进化与闭环管理。

2489862026-09-17

EPC项目中防雷接地系统全回路直流电阻测试数据与高频雷击响应效度关联分析路径研究

本研究指出:EPC项目中防雷接地系统全回路直流电阻测试数据,虽为常规验收依据,但与实际高频雷击下的响应效能存在显著脱节。直流电阻反映的是低频稳态导通能力,而雷电流具有陡波前、宽频谱(主能量集中于数十kHz至数MHz)特征,其泄流路径受电感、接触阻抗及高频趋肤效应主导,导致低频测试结果难以真实表征系统在真实雷击工况下的能量疏导效率。研究构建了从直流测试数据出发,耦合接地体几何参数、土壤频变特性及连接节点高频阻抗模型的关联分析路径,通过分段建模与等效电路映射,识别出影响高频响应的关键敏感因子。实践表明,仅依赖直流电阻达标易掩盖高频回路中断、多点并联失配或过渡连接劣化等隐性缺陷,进而削弱整体防雷可靠

9132792026-09-17

面向液冷改造的老旧机房管道空间复用率量化评估模型研究

本研究提出一种面向液冷改造的老旧机房管道空间复用率量化评估模型,核心观点是:老旧机房中既有管线路由并非简单“冗余”或“废弃”,而是一种可被系统性识别、分级激活的隐性资源;其实际复用潜力取决于物理约束、拓扑连通性与热管理适配性的三维耦合关系。模型摒弃经验式判断,通过构建空间可达性图谱与流体路径兼容性矩阵,将复杂工程约束转化为可计算的复用度指标,支持在不新增开槽破地前提下,科学判别哪些既有管道可直接承载液冷工质、哪些需局部加固、哪些须规避。该方法强化了改造决策的前置性与可验证性,有效降低因盲目复用引发的泄漏风险与二次返工成本。实践表明,模型能显著提升改造方案的可行性预判精度,缩短前期勘测周期,并为

4582882026-09-17

液冷改造中冷板-服务器适配接口标准化缺失下的渐进式兼容方案研究

当前液冷改造面临的核心瓶颈,并非技术可行性,而是冷板与服务器之间接口缺乏统一标准,导致硬件适配成本高、周期长、兼容性差。本研究提出“渐进式兼容”路径:不追求一步到位的标准化,而是以功能等效和物理可装配为前提,通过模块化接口设计、分层解耦(冷却流道/机械固定/信号交互)及可配置过渡结构,在保留既有服务器架构基础上实现冷板柔性适配。该方案将兼容性问题从“全有或全无”的二元选择,转化为可量化、可迭代的工程演进过程。实践表明,渐进式策略显著降低改造试错成本,提升多代服务器混用场景下的液冷部署弹性。其本质是承认技术演进的阶段性特征——标准往往滞后于应用,而系统韧性恰恰源于对异构现实的包容性设计。对决策者

1150562026-09-17

老旧机房改造中消防与安防系统信号干扰溯源与隔离机制研究

老旧机房改造中,消防与安防系统间的信号干扰并非孤立技术故障,而是多系统共存演进过程中电磁兼容性、线缆拓扑老化及协议协同弱化共同作用的结果。本研究通过现场频谱扫描、信号时序比对与接地路径建模,确认干扰主因集中于电源回路耦合、非屏蔽线缆串扰及火灾报警控制器与视频分析平台间异步触发引发的误报共振。针对此类问题,传统“单点屏蔽”或“设备替换”策略收效有限;真正有效的隔离需构建分层防御机制:在物理层强化等电位联结与分区布线,在链路层部署协议网关实现指令级过滤,在系统层引入时间窗仲裁逻辑抑制瞬态冲突。实践表明,该机制可显著降低误报率,同时保障消防响应时效不受影响。研究强调,改造不能仅关注功能叠加,而应将系